We may hear that there are opportunities everywhere and that every place can present a chance for us to take interesting photographs. One doesn’t need to live in New York to do (street) photography. Is that true?

There are a few aspects we need to consider regarding what it means to find opportunities.
We often head out to photograph with a specific genre, photographer, or style in mind, although, ideally, we should approach photography with an open mind (let’s set that aside for now). When someone complains about “no photographic opportunities” in their area, they usually mean they don’t see chances to capture images in the style of famous photographers like Winogrand or Meyerowitz. This likely reflects the difference in their environment compared to, say, New York City.

Let’s take, for instance, Los Angeles. It has nothing to do with the busy streets of New York. Not only that, the urbanistic is a different thing altogether, with its wide streets swept by drivers, nothing like the narrower paths of New York which are instead crowded by myriads of passers-by.

Recreating Winogrand’s iconic style solely by shooting in Los Angeles, like he did when he was in New York, is a very difficult feat.

If one compares Winogrand’s photographs based on where he took them, whether it was NY, LA, or Texas, one can’t help but notice how distant those photographs look from each other.

Let’s forget the crooked angle for a moment, and notice how bare the photographs taken in LA look like. The environment, with its desolating streets, and harsh light, doesn’t resemble the typical urban city at all. People don’t use sidewalks much, as everything is so spread apart that one needs a car even to go to the grocery store.

The human presence is therefore almost an outsider element that doesn’t belong there.

With this, I’m not implying a difference in quality, but rather only stating how the environment can shape what we put into a frame. Forcing ourselves to approach a place like LA with the same method we would use in a city like New York, it’s just a misrepresentation of our reality.

Therefore, when we hear a photographer say “You have the same opportunities as any other photographer in this world to take good photos” I would argue that’s not entirely accurate. The same photographer would never give up living in New York, and for good reasons. Furthermore, if opportunities were the same no matter the place, why would they choose 5th Ave and the like? Why transit to those areas, and not rather stay in their neighborhood, thus saving time, and money?

We all have our chances, as long as we adapt to our surroundings. Acknowledging that there’s something worth photographing also means we need to recognize its uniqueness, forget our preconceived ideas of what a photo is supposed to look like, and then adjust ourselves to what the environment is presenting to us. It’s the same in life. We need to reshape ourselves based on where we live. The environment, whether we like it or not, always ends up affecting our character. The same applies to photography.

As far as opportunities go, we do have them, but always in a given context to which we have to relate one way or another.